There’s a lot to like about Judas, the 2017 Man Booker Prize nominated novel by Amos Oz. An Israeli, Oz has exceptionally beautiful prose and seems to have mastered romantic longing in his stories.
This one if about Schmuel, a university student dedicated to the study if Jewish views of Christ – and that also if Judas, a largely demonised character in Christian mythology but not so much in historical record. But Schmuel’s life is upended when his parents announce they can no longer afford his school fees, and his girlfriend leaves him to marry her ex.
Schmuel quickly finds himself living as a companion to an old Jewish politician and his daughter-in-law, a sad and mysterious women who quickly he comes to dream about.
Its a book about foolish young hearts, unrequited love, intellectual curiosity, and the ostracising of the Jews for their failure to recognise Jesus as the messiah. Some of this was deeply religious, and some political and much of it admittedly outside of my sphere of understanding. And this did slow down my reading of what ultimately is a finely crafted story.
I always try to read a couple of the Man Booker nominations each year – although I find I’m rarely sophisticated enough to agree with the winner. This year’s winner – The Sellout – drove me a little mad. I haven’t given up on it entirely, but certainly I’ve given up on it for now.
His Bloody Project by Graeme Macrae Burnet was another matter. Subtitled Documents Relating to the Case of Roderick Macrae, the novel is styled like true crime, but in reality is totally fictional. It’s a vivid portrait of life in a small Scottish croft in the years proceeding 1869, and the bloody murders that occurred and subsequently gripped the imagination of the wider public. Part portrait, part social commentary His Bloody Project is both intelligent and readable. The characters are engaging and well-realised, particularly the murderer Roddy Macrae, who is an interesting blend of intelligence and naievety. This makes his trial all the more interesting – is he a cold-blooded killer or someone not capable of making a rational decision? Worth a look – more accessible no doubt than some of the other nominees.
It’s not very often that I would read – or enjoy – a novel that is ostensibly about cricket. But here I have. Aravind Adiga, who wowed us several years ago with The White Tiger and it’s complex portrayal of the caste system of India, turns his gaze on to India’s preoccupation with cricket in this, his third novel.
Two young boys – and cricket prodigies – have been raised by a single-minded father to pursue futures in cricket – a calling that will ensure a rise in class, wealth and status. Radha, the elder brother is already being courted by the junior cricket leagues, and his father ensures that the younger brother, Manjunath comes along as part of the package. Radha is everything Manju is not – tall, good-looking and popular with the girls. His skill seems unmatched by all except one of the other junior players, Javed Ansari.
While Javed should become their natural enemy in the competition, Manju befriends him and it is this friendship that introduces Manju to new ideas that will completely change the course of his life. Perhaps Manju has dreams that don’t involve cricket? Maybe he doesn’t have to give up his schooling and his love of science to become the next Tendulkar? Maybe there can be more to him than the only thing his father said anyone would ever care about? What if someone could love him for himself alone?
And while all this begins to resonate within Manjunath, his game changes too, and he begins to outshine his older brother….
A stunning novel about family, exploitation and the desire to become more than what one is, Selection Day is one of my favourite reads of 2016 to date. I now have Adiga’s second novel on my nightstand… thank goodness another one waits.
Many people rave about Julian Barnes, and indeed winning a Man Booker Prize tends to suggest you are brilliant at what you do. But I have at times struggled with his slow pacing and prose. At university I did not enjoy Flaubert’s Parrot, although a few years ago I did enjoy The Sense of an Ending, which admittedly I read on audio, which does tend to disguise or minimise pacing issues.
I was sent a review copy of his new novel – the first since the Booker – The Noise of Time. The concept is fascinating. Set his story in communist Russia, The Noise of Time is a painstaking fictional recreation of the life of real-life composer Dmitri Shostakovich, focussing specifically on the role of the political of the artists of the time.
Shostakovich was not ideological and resented the interference of the government on the lives of artists at the time. However, without political support, an artist was guaranteed obscurity and even in some cases, death. Shostakovich’s life is a series of compromises until he finally does not recognise the man riding around in a town car with political clout and overwhelming success. But it was a hard road, and many times Shostakovich feared for his life.
Despite these wonderful ideas and the human expression of the pressure to become part of the political propaganda machine, I found myself drifting off often during the novel, which failed to hold my interest in the way it really should have. This was hard work. But in the end, it was work worth doing. This is thoughtful and satisfying if you can make it to the end.